Conversation
providers/discord/src/airflow/providers/discord/hooks/discord_webhook.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
providers/discord/src/airflow/providers/discord/hooks/discord_webhook.py
Show resolved
Hide resolved
2b61dc2 to
4394a97
Compare
providers/discord/src/airflow/providers/discord/hooks/discord_webhook.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
1e45571 to
7e08be7
Compare
|
Looks like you have a handful of comments already, so I'll let things settle a bit before I review, but feel free to ping me when you are ready. As always, thanks for the work! |
Lee-W
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We still need some work to make the CI green. Mark it as draft before it's ready to review again. Thanks!
a6ba5c0 to
94c90a4
Compare
|
CI is green now. In my opinion, it makes sense to continue with this feature if it looks good. Yes, the backwards compatible part is redundant with #57143, but in my opinion we could add it to our open items list and change all providers to use the WDYT ? @ferruzzi @ramitkataria |
I'm not thrilled with how many todos we're leaving hanging, but I guess that's life. Resolve the comments that are resolved and I'll make a pass tomorrow. |
|
I'll mark it as draft. But please let us know when it's ready again. Looking forward to this one! |
94c90a4 to
0ffe1fc
Compare
Let's reduce our list of open items. I have opened a PR for the Slack provider for use |
|
Thank you for all the patience and support. I'm opening it up for another round of reviews. |
To be clear, that wasn't a jab at you by any means. Just in case it came off the wrong way. I greatly appreciate your work on these and hope I didn't imply otherwise. |
providers/discord/src/airflow/providers/discord/hooks/discord_webhook.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
0ffe1fc to
2de3d0c
Compare
Don't worry, I got it right. I like keeping things clean and I consider myself to have an intrinsic motivation to clean up my own things. |
providers/discord/src/airflow/providers/discord/hooks/discord_webhook.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
providers/discord/src/airflow/providers/discord/hooks/discord_webhook.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
providers/discord/src/airflow/providers/discord/hooks/discord_webhook.py
Show resolved
Hide resolved
0007227 to
be0b3ce
Compare
be0b3ce to
e349bef
Compare
|
Is there anything I can do to move forward with this PR? |
|
Will take a look tomorrow. |
providers/discord/src/airflow/providers/discord/hooks/discord_webhook.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
providers/discord/tests/unit/discord/notifications/test_discord.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
c0ab5ec to
5598892
Compare
|
Approve as the remaining one is a nitpick. @dondaum, please click resolve for the comments you think you've already resolved :) |
5598892 to
ba67b84
Compare
|
I'll keep it open for a few days so that other can take a look. But overall looks good! Thanks! |
jason810496
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR! LGTM to me overall !
providers/discord/src/airflow/providers/discord/hooks/discord_webhook.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ba67b84 to
1f02827
Compare
1f02827 to
280265c
Compare
Add an asynchronous version of
DiscordNotifier.related: #55237
I sucessfully tested the
DiscordNotifierwith the following Dag:^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.